Our Teams have the best Ai Tools but nothing has changed- September Session

RSVP now for September 22nd

Our teams have the best AI tools but nothing changed

Most organisations now have AI tooling across their product and engineering teams. Most of them are moving just a little faster then they were two years ago. The tools aren’t the problem. The operating model underneath them is.


Build is no longer the bottleneck. The new constraint is coordination: how teams align on what to build, how functions like legal, security, and design stay genuinely involved without becoming the gate everything stalls behind, and how leaders shift from approving decisions to setting the conditions that let good decisions happen without them.

This session draws on a live transformation across a large technology organisation, redesigning not just how teams build, but the entire system from idea to customer impact.

We’ll cover the three things that actually have to change for AI tooling to translate into speed:
– how work gets defined before it’s built
– how specialist functions engage without creating queues
– and how the PM role changes when coordination overhead drops and intent has to survive further and faster than ever before.

This isn’t a talk about tools. It’s about what your organisation needs to look like for the tools to matter.

Our speaker: Josh Centner

Josh has spent twenty years on a single question: why do good teams, with good people and good tools, still struggle to ship the right thing quickly? The answer is almost never the tools. It’s the operating model underneath.

His career has been built around transformation and product operations – helping organisations effectively adopt new ways of working, supporting strategic alignment, product delivery, and go-to-market execution. He was CPO at myprosperity and Head of Product and Delivery at PageUp, and spent years consulting into some of the largest organisations in the country, including Xero, Carsales, NAB, and IOOF as Head of Product and Design at Elabor8.

He is now co-founder of Zenforge, an AI transformation consultancy, and Principal Product Manager at SEEK, one of Australia’s largest technology organisations, where he’s helping lead the design and rollout of an AI-native product delivery lifecycle from strategy through to launch and optimisation.

Our sponsor: Netwealth

Netwealth is one of Australia’s leading wealth management platforms, providing technology and investment solutions for financial advisers and their clients. Since 1999, we’ve focused on innovation and challenging the status quo, building digital products that help Australians see wealth differently and achieve better financial outcomes. At the heart of Netwealth is a culture of curious, collaborative, courageous, optimistic, agile and genuine people who are passionate about solving meaningful problems and creating better experiences for customers. For more about careers at Netwealth.

RSVP here

Recap: Connecting the Dots – Product Sense with Maxy Lotherington. July Recap

At our latest Product Anonymous session, Maxy Lotherington – who heads up Product and Design at InvestorHub, a FinTech scale-up – walked us through what “product sense” actually is, how to build it, and how she uses AI to sharpen it. Here are the highlights.

What is product sense?

Maxy’s simple definition: product sense is knowing something will work before you build it. It’s not magic – it’s pattern matching, backed by research (she pointed to The Intuition Toolkit for the science behind gut instinct).

At its core, product management is about figuring out what customer problem to solve, which Maxy frames as connecting the dots – pulling together customer quotes, sales notes, strategy, support tickets, and analytics into a coherent picture of the problem. If you’ve ever written a PRD with an “evidence” section, you’ve already been doing this.

Product sense is what happens when that dot-connecting becomes constant and automatic – updating in the background every time you hear something new, rather than only when you sit down to plan. It’s why strong PMs can react to an idea instantly and just know something’s off.

The other key piece: don’t just connect internal dots (customer feedback, analytics, company data). The richest, most accurate picture comes from also weaving in external dots – the wider world, other products, other industries.

Building your dot collection

Product sense is a long-term, deliberate practice, not a one-off skill you pick up. Maxy shared three ways to keep collecting dots:

  1. Consume product content – newsletters and teardown resources like Growth.Design, Lenny’s podcast and the SVPG blog. Following the right people on LinkedIn helps too.
  2. Use lots of products – including bad ones. Maxy’s opened Product Hunt every morning for a decade. Using more products (and noticing when something feels off) builds intuition for what works.
  3. Talk and share – communities like Product Anonymous and ProductCamp are exactly this. Swapping stories about what worked and what didn’t extends your pattern library beyond your own experience.

Her bonus tip: if you’re not naturally great at remembering things you come across, write them down somewhere (she uses a tool called Mymind).

Evaluating your connected dots

Once you’ve connected dots into a hypothesis, Maxy’s framework is to stress-test it against five failure modes:

  • Unanchored problems – you can’t say when or why a user would actually hit this problem.
  • Fake problems – the “problem” only exists because of something you built or shipped.
  • Obvious solutions – if it’s everyone’s first idea (or the customer’s own suggested fix), pressure-test it. Customers are right about their pain, rarely right about the solution.
  • Shallow problems – using the “five whys,” can you get past the first layer? If not, you’re missing depth.
  • Indefensible problems – if you can’t explain the problem clearly and people don’t follow, the dots you connected may not actually belong together.

The InvestorHub story: solving a problem no one asked for

Maxy shared a case study from her own company (an “end-to-end investor relations” platform). InvestorHub had built seven separate content tools – email, Twitter, LinkedIn, blog posts – each patched repeatedly based on direct feedback, with no one ever asking for them to be unified.

Drawing on external experience running a content team, Maxy recognized the pattern from a framework called COPE (Create Once, Publish Everywhere) and pushed for a single content engine that was published across all channels. No customer had asked for it, and the idea took real convincing internally – but it became InvestorHub’s most popular feature. The lesson: your richest solutions often come from dots outside your own company or industry, not just from customer requests.

Using AI to connect dots

Maxy closed with her Claude workflow. Her view: AI is excellent at connecting internal dots (company data, research, sales notes) – but that’s the easy, “average” part of the job. Where PMs add value is bringing in external context and judgment.

Her approach is to build a thorough, manually-written context library for Claude covering business context, cross-functional teams, customer segments, competitors, product/roadmap details, and team structure – updated regularly. Writing it by hand (rather than pulling from the codebase) forces her to actually understand the product deeply, and surfaces gaps in her own knowledge. With that context in place, Claude becomes a genuine thinking partner for higher-level strategic conversations, freeing her up from time spent on basic internal analysis.


Thanks to Maxy for a brilliant, practical session – and to everyone who jumped into the workshop exercises. See you at the next Product Anonymous, and don’t forget ProductCamp is coming up on August 8th.